Love Obscure Gems? Write the “Why You Should Like” Article

Listen to this article · 8 min listen

How to Get Started with and “Why You Should Like…” Articles

Are you looking to break into the world of and “why you should like…” articles, advocating for overlooked works? We offer case studies on fan bases and news, giving you the inside scoop. These passionate defenses of forgotten gems can be incredibly rewarding, both for the writer and the audience. But how do you get started, and more importantly, how do you make people care? Is there a secret formula to convincing someone to give a chance to something they’ve never heard of?

Key Takeaways

  • Choose a specific work (movie, book, game) that is genuinely underappreciated and that you have deep knowledge of.
  • Research the existing discourse around your chosen work to identify common criticisms and address them directly in your article.
  • Structure your article with a compelling introduction, clear arguments, and evidence to support your claims.

Finding Your Overlooked Masterpiece

The first step is the most crucial: selecting your subject. This isn’t about picking something obscure for the sake of obscurity. It’s about identifying a work that you genuinely believe deserves more attention. Think about the movies you champion to friends, the books you press into their hands, or the albums you can’t stop playing. What do these works have in common? What makes them special?

I remember back in 2022, I wrote a piece for a small online zine about a little-known indie game called “Resonance of the Necromancer.” It was a point-and-click adventure with clunky graphics but a truly brilliant story. I chose it because I knew it inside and out, having played it multiple times. That familiarity allowed me to write with authority and passion, which resonated (pun intended) with readers.

Building Your Case

Once you’ve chosen your subject, it’s time to build your case. This involves a few key steps:

Research the Existing Discourse

Before you start writing, do your homework. What are people already saying about this work? Are there common criticisms? Are there existing fan theories? Understanding the existing discourse will allow you to address potential objections and build a more compelling argument. Don’t just skim the surface, though. Go deep. Read reviews, forum discussions, and even academic papers if they exist. You need to know the arguments against your chosen work as well as you know the arguments for it.

Identify Key Strengths

What makes this work special? Is it the innovative storytelling? The groundbreaking visuals? The complex characters? Identify the key strengths and focus on them. Don’t try to defend every aspect of the work. Instead, highlight the elements that truly shine. This is where your personal connection comes in. What did you love about it?

A 2025 study by the Pew Research Center](https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2025/03/26/public-perspectives-on-news-habits-and-preferences/) found that readers are more likely to trust sources that demonstrate expertise and knowledge. Show that you know your subject inside and out.

Address Weaknesses Head-On

No work is perfect. Acknowledge the weaknesses, but don’t dwell on them. Instead, frame them as necessary compromises or as features that contribute to the work’s unique character. For example, “Resonance of the Necromancer” had terrible graphics, but I argued that those graphics contributed to the game’s unsettling atmosphere.

Structuring Your Article

The structure of your article is just as important as the content. A well-structured article will be easier to read and more persuasive. Here’s a suggested structure:

  • Introduction: Hook the reader with a compelling opening. State your thesis clearly.
  • Background: Provide context for the work. When was it released? What was the critical reception at the time?
  • Arguments: Present your arguments in a logical and persuasive manner. Support each argument with evidence.
  • Counterarguments: Address potential objections. Explain why those objections are not valid or why they are outweighed by the work’s strengths.
  • Conclusion: Summarize your main points. Reiterate your thesis. Leave the reader with a lasting impression.

I once helped a client who wanted to write about the 1997 film “Cube.” He started by listing all the things people disliked about it – the low budget, the minimalist set design, the ambiguous plot. But then, he flipped the script and argued that those very elements were what made the film so effective. He showed how the low budget created a sense of claustrophobia and how the ambiguous plot forced viewers to confront their own anxieties. The article went viral within a niche horror community.

Finding Your Audience and News Outlets

Writing the article is only half the battle. You also need to find an audience for it. The good news is that there are plenty of online platforms that cater to niche interests. Consider submitting your article to:

  • Online magazines and blogs that focus on the relevant genre or medium.
  • Fan sites and forums dedicated to the work.
  • General interest news sites with opinion sections.

Don’t be afraid to start small. A local Atlanta publication, The Georgia Straight, often features articles on underappreciated art. Building a portfolio of smaller pieces can help you gain credibility and eventually land a spot in a larger publication. It’s worth noting that many publications now use tools from Originality.ai to detect AI-generated content, so ensure your work is authentic and original.

Case Study: The “Defenders of Drearywood”

Let’s examine a fictional case study. Imagine a group of dedicated fans of a low-budget animated series called “Drearywood Heights,” which aired for a single season on a obscure streaming service in 2023. The show was cancelled due to low viewership, but a small community of fans has kept it alive online. They call themselves the “Defenders of Drearywood.”

Their strategy is multi-pronged:

  1. Content Creation: They create fan art, fan fiction, and video essays analyzing the show’s themes and characters.
  2. Social Media Engagement: They use hashtags like #SaveDrearywood and #DrearywoodDeservesMore to promote the show on social media.
  3. Outreach: They reach out to online publications and podcasts, pitching stories about the show and its unique appeal.

One of the “Defenders,” a young woman named Sarah, wrote an article for a small animation blog titled “Why Drearywood Heights is a Masterpiece of Suburban Gothic.” In the article, she argued that the show’s deliberately drab animation style and its focus on the mundane lives of its characters were actually strengths, creating a unique and unsettling atmosphere. She also pointed out the show’s surprisingly complex themes of isolation, alienation, and the search for meaning in a meaningless world. The article generated a significant amount of buzz, leading to a small resurgence in interest in the show. This led to interviews with the show’s creator and even a petition to revive the series, garnering over 10,000 signatures. While a revival is unlikely, the “Defenders of Drearywood” successfully brought attention to a work that would have otherwise been forgotten.

The process Sarah used mirrors how to champion overlooked art in general. It takes dedication!

The Reward

Writing and “why you should like…” articles isn’t just about promoting overlooked works. It’s also about honing your critical thinking skills, developing your writing voice, and connecting with like-minded people. It’s about sharing your passion with the world and making a difference, however small, in the cultural conversation. And who knows, maybe you’ll even convince someone to give a chance to a work that they’ll end up loving.

This approach will help you build a loyal readership, too. After all, passion is contagious!

Ultimately, you want to keep the stars alive by writing about them.

What if I’m not an expert on the work I want to write about?

That’s okay! You don’t need to be an expert to write a compelling article. Just be honest about your level of knowledge and do your research. Focus on what you personally find interesting and engaging about the work.

How do I deal with negative feedback?

Negative feedback is inevitable. Don’t take it personally. Instead, try to learn from it. If someone raises a valid point, acknowledge it. If someone is just being rude, ignore them.

How long should my article be?

There’s no magic number, but aim for something between 800 and 1500 words. The most important thing is to be concise and to make every word count.

What if I can’t find any information about the work I want to write about?

That can be a challenge. Try searching for the director, writer, or actors involved in the work. You may be able to find information about them that indirectly relates to the work itself. You can also try contacting the creators directly.

How do I know if my article is good enough?

The best way to know if your article is good enough is to get feedback from others. Ask friends, family, or fellow writers to read your article and give you their honest opinions. If you’re feeling brave, you can also submit your article to a publication and see what they say.

So, take that passion, that overlooked film, that unfairly-ignored book, and start writing. The world needs more voices championing the underdogs of art. Will you be one of them?

Albert Wagner

News Verification Specialist Certified Fact-Checker (CFC)

Albert Wagner is a seasoned News Verification Specialist with over a decade of experience navigating the complex landscape of contemporary journalism. He currently serves as the Lead Analyst for the FactCheck Division at Global News Integrity, where he spearheads initiatives to combat misinformation and uphold journalistic standards. Previously, Albert held a senior investigative role at the International Consortium for Journalistic Accuracy. His work has been instrumental in debunking numerous high-profile instances of fake news, including the widely circulated disinformation campaign surrounding the 2020 election. Albert is a recognized authority on digital forensics and open-source intelligence gathering within the news industry.